Stop Arguing Marijuana Isn’t Harmful!

Attorney Marc J. Victor

I’ll admit I don’t know conclusively whether marijuana use is harmful. To some extent, virtually everything we consume is harmful in some way to our bodies. A strong case can be made that ingestion of dairy, red meat, soda pop, prescription medications, alcohol, and many other things we routinely consume are harmful. Even excessive clean water intake can be deadly. Wasting time arguing about whether marijuana use is harmful is missing, or even conceding, our best and most important argument for marijuana legalization.

Years ago, when I was younger and dumber, I recall engaging in discussions about whether being gay or lesbian was simply a voluntary choice or a matter of one’s nature. Today, it’s hard for me to conceive of a more irrelevant political or legal question. My simple response to that question today is, “Who cares?” To civilized people, this question is irrelevant because we respect the legal rights of competent adults to engage in consensual sex with other competent adults of their choosing regardless of any contrary personal moral judgments about that activity.

Thankfully, we no longer need to engage in discussions about whether homosexual sex is immoral, unhealthy, or unnatural. It matters not whether a competent adult chooses to engage in homosexual sex with another competent adult because of an intentional preference or whether it has been forced upon such a person by genetics or some other natural cause. That a competent adult prefers members of the same sex is all that matters. We have matured as a society to simply accept such a choice as a legally protected right.

Said another way, as a society, we have arrived at an important conclusion regarding homosexual sex; the competent adult person who owns the body gets to decide how his or her own body is used. I’ll admit this seems a rather obvious conclusion. Unfortunately, it seems this obvious conclusion is not so obvious to many.

Imagine how inappropriate and sad it would be to have to justify one’s right to engage in homosexual sex with another consenting adult on the basis of whether other people could be convinced such activity was “healthy” or “moral” or even a “good lifestyle choice.” Imagine being required to convince others to approve our sex-related value judgments before we were legally permitted to engage in consensual sex with other competent adults. Such a requirement would be deemed obviously wrong and immoral by all reasonable people. Yet, this is exactly what some well-intentioned people attempt to do in the case of marijuana.

Identical to the question of homosexual sex with consenting adults, the issue of marijuana use presents the same old critical question; who owns your body? The possible answers fall into two categories: 1. You; or 2. Some other person or group of people. Don’t you think you ought to own you? Duh! Hopefully, you will observe the obvious; the issue of homosexual sex and the issue of marijuana use are essentially the same questions.

Many of today’s hottest political topics are simply different versions of the same question. Who is in charge of your body? The seemingly unrelated issues of euthanasia, seatbelts, motorcycle helmets, forced vaccinations, experimental prescription drug use, unapproved medical procedures, and prostitution are all the exact same questions too. They all ought to be resolved the same way. Civilized people recognize the rights of competent adults to control their own bodies. In short, you own you.

Free competent adults not only recognize their absolute right to control their own bodies but also proudly assert their absolute right to control their own peacefully acquired property, money, and time. Either we seek to be free or we are content to be partial slaves. I realize freedom can be scary for some people, but we need to evolve to something more than symbolically singing songs about freedom. Let’s advocate peacefully, but aggressively, for freedom in all of its expressions!

To be fair, I’m not saying the hard-earned progress achieved in the medical marijuana area has been a waste of time. Indeed, there is no doubt the use of marijuana has helped many ill and suffering people. Encouragingly, at the time I’m writing this article, we now have twenty-eight states with medical marijuana programs. More states will surely follow soon. Additionally, we now have eight states that have moved towards legalized marijuana for recreational uses. The trend, even worldwide, is clearly moving towards a rejection of the utterly failed and totally idiotic drug war policies.

I concede arguments for the medicinal uses of marijuana have opened doors for the argument to legalize marijuana for recreational purposes as well. Many people, including myself, have advanced valid and persuasive economic-related arguments involving the real, substantial, and almost immediate benefits of ending the drug war generally. There are always different and effective avenues of attack to combat all forms of tyranny. Unfortunately, it seems no argument is as prevalent and currently fashionable as the issue of whether marijuana is harmful.

Undoubtedly, the argument is strong that, if marijuana is harmful at all, it isn’t nearly as harmful as many other legally available products and foods. However, the argument is also strong that monogamous or protected homosexual sex is not unhealthy. We don’t assert that argument because it is unnecessary and also demeans the dignity and sovereignty of those competent adults who would choose to engage in it. The same can and should be said about the marijuana issue.

We have a spectacular opportunity right now to shift the discussion surrounding marijuana from the argument that marijuana is not unhealthy to the much more important argument that marijuana should be legal because competent adults own themselves and therefore control their own bodies.

There are many valid arguments to justify legalizing marijuana or even ending the drug war. However, the argument that free people own themselves is not only the best argument for the legalization of marijuana, it is the only argument needed to cure our current ills and get us to the free society that all humans deserve. Let’s start aggressively advancing the argument that we own ourselves!

Attorney Marc J. Victor

Pirate M.
Pirate M.
1715105983
Hello To all,I want to say that Attorneys for Freedom are an outstanding law firm for restoration... of Rights! I'd like to point out my Gratitude and stellar service that I received from Brittany my assigned attorney and Bonny her paralegal. What I thought was going to take 3-4 months or more for restoration of my Rights happened in less than the 3 months they estimated. Talk about under promising and over delivering, here they are. I am so pleased with the way these 2 Awesome ladies helped me and handled my restoration of rights. Even when the Courts "misplaced or accidentally neglected" one of my cases, They were on top of it and completed the task for signatory approval asap, in my opinion, above the standard. I recommend this Law Firm to anyone and everyone that may need help for Rights Restoration.I will be moving forward with Attorneys on Retainer as well so that I know I have the bigger Gorilla in my corner when it comes to legal matters with a self defense situation! I am glad there is a reputable and stellar law firm that loves the Constitution and supports our 2nd Amendment Right! I couldn't be happier.read more
Megasportsman79
Megasportsman79
1714953297
These guys are the real deal !!! I found out about them from you tube’s Heavy duty country channel.... He exposed all the “self defense ins schemes”. Mark Victor and his team are unbelievable! My wife and I as well as my fam will always be members ! Keep up the great work!!!!read more
Joel C.
Joel C.
1714778522
I have a strong legal background anend as such I really vetted AOR as a solution for my need for a... firm with dedicated and sound legal representation. I thoroughly scrutinized the agreements, the founding attorneys, the reviueews, and to the extent attorney client privilege would allow, their reputation in the legal community.AORs Self-Protection Retainer Agreement is justly unilateral and legally fair in its Ts and Cs.It is broad and comprehensive for the kind of protection we in the gun advocacy community need as opposed the other kinds of so called triditional self defense defense "insurance" who offer to pay defense expenses but who's "policy" Ts an Cs have more exclusion language than coverage statements. However, the real advantage lies with their customer service. I made a dozen calls to clarify questions I had before I signed up and each time an incredibley knowledgeable CS rep named Tristen responded immediately. Every question was answered expertly and as a member I am entitled to speak directly to any attorney personally. I made the same inquiries in comparison with the insurance carriers and was put on hold, transferred asked to email in a question or was never called back. In a crises, who do you want to talk to in your moment of need,Tristen, or an attorney OR a voicemail, a requested email or a call center for a promise of call back?read more
Dominic P.
Dominic P.
1714778171
left FLP (Firearms Legal Protection) and i can actually say i dont regret it at all, its was well... worth it after doing my research and also watching AOR videos, AOR thank youread more
CC C.
CC C.
1714413376
ATENTION to ALL FIREARM OWNERS:("ATTORNEY'S for FREEDOM & ATTORNEY'S on RETAINER") are without... question the "ONLY" CHOICE for your Legal Defense in a court of Law!! I have done my homework on other companies who say they will defend you if you hold a policy of there insurance!! ......"ATTORNEY'S ON RETAINER": are the (ONLY ONES WHO ARE REAL ATTORNEY'S) These other shills are insurance companies, period!!! Don't take my word for it.... do your own research of ("USCCA")...("US LAW SHIELD")...("FIREARMS LEGAL PROTECTION")...("Second Call Defense")...("ARMED CITIZENS LEGAL DEFENSE")...("CCW SAFE")...("Right To Bear")!!! Check out there POLICY descriptions!! EXAMPLE: USCCA POLICY SAYS in the fine print.... if they defend you in court and you are found guilty...("YOU THE POLICY HOLDER") must pay back to the insurance company "all FEES and costs" to the insurance company ("USCCA)"!!! Would you trust this policy to protect you from a potential prison sentence??? I think not!!! Do you homework as I HAVE!! ("ATTORNEY'S ON RETAINER") should be your ONLY CHOICE to protect you in Court!! I just secured my POLICY!!! Get smart and protect yourself and your family!!!! This is not a paid nor shill advertisement!!! By a PATRIOT who cares about your right to defend yourself and those you Love!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💖☝️😀read more
js_loader