Automobile and Cyclist Liability in a ‘Dooring’ Accident

Injury Accident Attorneys

Bicyclists are frequently injured after colliding with an open car door, particularly when a driver is getting out of a vehicle along a line of parked cars. The most serious dooring-related injuries occur when bicyclists are struck by another motor vehicle after swerving to avoid the door. In any event, determining who is liable when a cyclist gets doored requires the skills of an experienced personal injury attorney.

The Perils of Dooring Accidents

With more bicycle messengers, commuters, Citibikes, or those cycling for leisure or exercise on the streets today, dooring accidents have become far too common. In fact, a study of bicycle accidents in New York City found that 3 percent of the resulting fatalities involved dooring accidents.

As congested as the city streets are at any given moment, all drivers have a duty of care to operate their vehicles in a safe manner and avoid causing injuries to others. Similarly, bicycle riders are responsible for their own safety and must abide by all traffic laws. This includes using a bike lane when one is provided or riding to the right of traffic which often forces them to ride perilously close to parked vehicles.

While bicyclists must be aware of other cars and pedestrians, drivers and passengers are required to check for bicycle traffic before opening a car door. Generally, the person who opened the door is typically liable if a bicyclist is doored, but a lot depends on the laws of the city or state in which the accident occurred.

Although these laws play a key role in determining who is at fault in a dooring accident, the number of damages an injured cyclist can recover depends on the circumstances of the accident. If there was no traffic on the road at the time of the collision, or the bicyclist was traveling at a high speed, they could determine that the cyclist was partially responsible.

This means that in states like New York that have a modified comparative negligence rule, the number of the injured cyclist’s damages would be reduced by his or her share of the fault. In the example noted above, if the court holds the driver was 80 percent liable and the cyclist 20 percent liable, and the number of injuries sustained is $100,000, the award would be reduced by 20 percent to $80,000.

The Takeaway

In the end, a cyclist injured in a dooring accident may be entitled to compensation for lost earnings and income, medical bills, pain and suffering, and other losses. If a bicyclist is killed in a dooring accident, his or her immediate surviving family members may be able to pursue a wrongful death lawsuit. If you or a loved one has been injured in a dooring accident, an adept bicycle accident attorney can help you obtain the compensation you deserve.

Megasportsman79
Megasportsman79
1714953297
These guys are the real deal !!! I found out about them from you tube’s Heavy duty country channel.... He exposed all the “self defense ins schemes”. Mark Victor and his team are unbelievable! My wife and I as well as my fam will always be members ! Keep up the great work!!!!read more
Joel C.
Joel C.
1714778522
I have a strong legal background anend as such I really vetted AOR as a solution for my need for a... firm with dedicated and sound legal representation. I thoroughly scrutinized the agreements, the founding attorneys, the reviueews, and to the extent attorney client privilege would allow, their reputation in the legal community.AORs Self-Protection Retainer Agreement is justly unilateral and legally fair in its Ts and Cs.It is broad and comprehensive for the kind of protection we in the gun advocacy community need as opposed the other kinds of so called triditional self defense defense "insurance" who offer to pay defense expenses but who's "policy" Ts an Cs have more exclusion language than coverage statements. However, the real advantage lies with their customer service. I made a dozen calls to clarify questions I had before I signed up and each time an incredibley knowledgeable CS rep named Tristen responded immediately. Every question was answered expertly and as a member I am entitled to speak directly to any attorney personally. I made the same inquiries in comparison with the insurance carriers and was put on hold, transferred asked to email in a question or was never called back. In a crises, who do you want to talk to in your moment of need,Tristen, or an attorney OR a voicemail, a requested email or a call center for a promise of call back?read more
Dominic P.
Dominic P.
1714778171
left FLP (Firearms Legal Protection) and i can actually say i dont regret it at all, its was well... worth it after doing my research and also watching AOR videos, AOR thank youread more
CC C.
CC C.
1714413376
ATENTION to ALL FIREARM OWNERS:("ATTORNEY'S for FREEDOM & ATTORNEY'S on RETAINER") are without... question the "ONLY" CHOICE for your Legal Defense in a court of Law!! I have done my homework on other companies who say they will defend you if you hold a policy of there insurance!! ......"ATTORNEY'S ON RETAINER": are the (ONLY ONES WHO ARE REAL ATTORNEY'S) These other shills are insurance companies, period!!! Don't take my word for it.... do your own research of ("USCCA")...("US LAW SHIELD")...("FIREARMS LEGAL PROTECTION")...("Second Call Defense")...("ARMED CITIZENS LEGAL DEFENSE")...("CCW SAFE")...("Right To Bear")!!! Check out there POLICY descriptions!! EXAMPLE: USCCA POLICY SAYS in the fine print.... if they defend you in court and you are found guilty...("YOU THE POLICY HOLDER") must pay back to the insurance company "all FEES and costs" to the insurance company ("USCCA)"!!! Would you trust this policy to protect you from a potential prison sentence??? I think not!!! Do you homework as I HAVE!! ("ATTORNEY'S ON RETAINER") should be your ONLY CHOICE to protect you in Court!! I just secured my POLICY!!! Get smart and protect yourself and your family!!!! This is not a paid nor shill advertisement!!! By a PATRIOT who cares about your right to defend yourself and those you Love!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💖☝️😀read more
Arthur K.
Arthur K.
1714059956
I Use to be a member of U.S./Texas Law Shield Insurance, When I found out about so many exclusions... and Reasons that U.S. Law Shield could drop you I didn't feel secure if I had to defend myself or family and friends. I was Recommended by Heavy Duty Country's YouTube Channel To The Attorneys On Retainer Program and was amazed at how much coverage it offers. Now I feel Completely 100% Secure that if I ever needed to defend myself or family and friends i would not have to worry. It's great that they cover all 50 State including Texas. The ladies and gentlemen from the Attorneys On Retainer Program are very Knowledgeable, Nice, Patient and Understanding and will assist and answer any and all your questions you have. I Pray I never get put in a situation where I have to defend myself, my home or others but knowing that The Attorneys On Retainer program has my back is a great feeling.read more
js_loader