Chandler Contract Dispute Lawyers | Attorneys for Freedom Law Firm

Chandler Contract Dispute Attorneys

Do you have a Breach of Contract case in Arizona? As a preliminary matter, a contract must be valid and enforceable for a party to seek compliance. In Arizona, a contract must include an offer, acceptance, and consideration, which means the benefit that each party gets or expects to get from the agreement such as money, value, performance, etc. While many contracts can be written or oral, there are certain contracts that must be in writing to be legally enforceable under Arizona law. Among others, contracts for the sale of real estate, lease agreements for more than a year, guarantees of another’s debt, and the sale of goods over $500 must be in writing to be enforceable under Arizona’s statute of frauds, A.R.S. §44-101.

A breach of contract occurs when a party fails to comply with the terms of the agreement. However, there are different types of remedies for different types of breaches that may occur. Generally, a breach may be material, partial, or anticipatory. A material breach occurs when a party fails to fully comply with their obligations under the agreement. A partial breach occurs when a party performs some terms but fails to completely perform all their obligations. Finally, an anticipatory breach occurs when one party anticipates the other party will not or is unable to fully perform their contractual obligations.

To maintain a breach of contract claim, a party must establish each of the following: (1) the existence of a valid and enforceable contract, (2) performance by the party bringing the claim or reasonable efforts to fulfill their contractual obligations, (3) the other party’s failure to perform as required under the agreement, and (4) damages and losses resulting from the breach, which includes all losses that are the natural and probable consequence of the breach of the contract.

Parties can resolve issues relating to contract disputes in various ways. First, the parties can informally try to work out their differences or agree to revise the terms of the agreement as acceptable by all parties. If a dispute occurs, the parties may want to consider private mediation or arbitration, by which a neutral third-party acts as a mediator to assist in trying to help the parties settle the dispute or as an arbitrator who will make a decision to resolve the dispute. Please be advised that some contracts may include an arbitration provision that requires the parties to arbitrate any disputes under the contract.

If the parties are unable to informally resolve the dispute, a common action is a lawsuit. Most contract claims must be brought within 6 years, but there may some exceptions that shorten that time. The amount in dispute often dictates where a lawsuit may be filed. In this regard, a claim for $3,500 or less may be brought in small claims court. Claims for $10,000 or less may be brought in justice court, while claims over $10,000 may be brought in the applicable county superior court. Federal court may have jurisdiction if the parties are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.

There are various defenses to breach of contract claims. Defenses may include the lack of a valid or enforceable contract, such as the lack of the contract formation requirements, lack of a written agreement as required for certain contracts, or the lack of capacity to legally contract as with contract with minors or someone deemed mentally incompetent. A party may also have a defense if that party was fraudulently induced to enter into the agreement by deception, lies, misrepresentations, or duress. Mistake by both parties to the terms of the agreement may also be grounds for a defense to a breach of contract claim. An example of a mistake is where one party has a couple of bicycles and the contract calls for the sale of a bicycle, but the contract was unclear as to which bicycle and each party truly believed the sale was for a different bicycle.

A party may also defend a breach of contract claim by claiming the contract is unconscionable. A grossly unfair contract may be unconscionable and unenforceable. This situation usually occurs when one party has most, if not all, of the bargaining power, and that party forces considerably unfair terms, conditions, or waivers on the other party. Estoppel is another defense often asserted. An example of estoppel occurs when one party excuses performance of a contract term and the other party relies on that statement, and the party excusing performance is prevented from later denying that performance was excused then claiming a breach. There is also a defense to breach of contract if the contract is illegal and therefore unenforceable. In this regard, a contract to engage in illegal activities is not enforceable, such as a contract to rob a bank, to engage in tax fraud, or to sell alcohol to minors.

Other defenses may exist depending on the terms of the agreement, the underlying facts and situation, and circumstances specific to the agreement. Also, there may be situation involving partial defenses. In this regard, a breaching party may agree he/she/it breached the agreement but disputes the amount of damages or remedies sought by the non-breaching party.

If you are dealing with a contract dispute in Chandler, you should consider consulting an attorney to discuss your rights and the options available to you. email the Attorneys for Freedom Law Firm or call us at 480-755-7110 to discuss your contract dispute matter.

Arizona Office Address:
3185 S. Price Rd.
Chandler, AZ 85248
Phone: 480-755-7110

Pirate M.
Pirate M.
1715105983
Hello To all,I want to say that Attorneys for Freedom are an outstanding law firm for restoration... of Rights! I'd like to point out my Gratitude and stellar service that I received from Brittany my assigned attorney and Bonny her paralegal. What I thought was going to take 3-4 months or more for restoration of my Rights happened in less than the 3 months they estimated. Talk about under promising and over delivering, here they are. I am so pleased with the way these 2 Awesome ladies helped me and handled my restoration of rights. Even when the Courts "misplaced or accidentally neglected" one of my cases, They were on top of it and completed the task for signatory approval asap, in my opinion, above the standard. I recommend this Law Firm to anyone and everyone that may need help for Rights Restoration.I will be moving forward with Attorneys on Retainer as well so that I know I have the bigger Gorilla in my corner when it comes to legal matters with a self defense situation! I am glad there is a reputable and stellar law firm that loves the Constitution and supports our 2nd Amendment Right! I couldn't be happier.read more
Megasportsman79
Megasportsman79
1714953297
These guys are the real deal !!! I found out about them from you tube’s Heavy duty country channel.... He exposed all the “self defense ins schemes”. Mark Victor and his team are unbelievable! My wife and I as well as my fam will always be members ! Keep up the great work!!!!read more
Joel C.
Joel C.
1714778522
I have a strong legal background anend as such I really vetted AOR as a solution for my need for a... firm with dedicated and sound legal representation. I thoroughly scrutinized the agreements, the founding attorneys, the reviueews, and to the extent attorney client privilege would allow, their reputation in the legal community.AORs Self-Protection Retainer Agreement is justly unilateral and legally fair in its Ts and Cs.It is broad and comprehensive for the kind of protection we in the gun advocacy community need as opposed the other kinds of so called triditional self defense defense "insurance" who offer to pay defense expenses but who's "policy" Ts an Cs have more exclusion language than coverage statements. However, the real advantage lies with their customer service. I made a dozen calls to clarify questions I had before I signed up and each time an incredibley knowledgeable CS rep named Tristen responded immediately. Every question was answered expertly and as a member I am entitled to speak directly to any attorney personally. I made the same inquiries in comparison with the insurance carriers and was put on hold, transferred asked to email in a question or was never called back. In a crises, who do you want to talk to in your moment of need,Tristen, or an attorney OR a voicemail, a requested email or a call center for a promise of call back?read more
Dominic P.
Dominic P.
1714778171
left FLP (Firearms Legal Protection) and i can actually say i dont regret it at all, its was well... worth it after doing my research and also watching AOR videos, AOR thank youread more
CC C.
CC C.
1714413376
ATENTION to ALL FIREARM OWNERS:("ATTORNEY'S for FREEDOM & ATTORNEY'S on RETAINER") are without... question the "ONLY" CHOICE for your Legal Defense in a court of Law!! I have done my homework on other companies who say they will defend you if you hold a policy of there insurance!! ......"ATTORNEY'S ON RETAINER": are the (ONLY ONES WHO ARE REAL ATTORNEY'S) These other shills are insurance companies, period!!! Don't take my word for it.... do your own research of ("USCCA")...("US LAW SHIELD")...("FIREARMS LEGAL PROTECTION")...("Second Call Defense")...("ARMED CITIZENS LEGAL DEFENSE")...("CCW SAFE")...("Right To Bear")!!! Check out there POLICY descriptions!! EXAMPLE: USCCA POLICY SAYS in the fine print.... if they defend you in court and you are found guilty...("YOU THE POLICY HOLDER") must pay back to the insurance company "all FEES and costs" to the insurance company ("USCCA)"!!! Would you trust this policy to protect you from a potential prison sentence??? I think not!!! Do you homework as I HAVE!! ("ATTORNEY'S ON RETAINER") should be your ONLY CHOICE to protect you in Court!! I just secured my POLICY!!! Get smart and protect yourself and your family!!!! This is not a paid nor shill advertisement!!! By a PATRIOT who cares about your right to defend yourself and those you Love!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💖☝️😀read more
js_loader