Don’t Be Your Own Worst Enemy

Attorney Marc J. Victor

I cringe to think how many times clients come into my office to discuss their criminal matter with me only to learn they have done possibly irreparable damage to their case. I have found few people who are aware of their constitutional rights.

Your awareness of some simple concepts may serve you well in the event you or a loved one is the unfortunate subject of a criminal investigation. First of all, always remember, you are not required to talk to the police. There may be occasions where your persuasive oral skills will serve to get you a stern warning instead of a costly ticket; however, talking with the police will rarely benefit you when the investigation is for a crime.

In addition, talking to friends and family about your criminal matter is usually not a good idea either. Although you do not expect a friend or family member to compromise your case, you may put him or her in an unfair position. A prosecutor may summon your family member or friend to the witness stand in a criminal trial and ask questions about your statements. Such a dilemma will force your family member or friend to decide between perjury and possibly hurting your case.

Don’t get caught up by the fact that the police officer failed to inform you of your “Miranda Rights.” These are your rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. So long as you are not under “arrest” the police officer may properly ask you questions without informing you of these rights.

You are never required to consent to a search. If a police officer has a search warrant, you must permit the search. However, if a search warrant has not yet been obtained, you should insist the officer obtain one before you voluntarily allow a search. The fact that you insist upon a search warrant does not mean you have something to hide. Rather, it is a confirmation of the constitutional concept that police do not have the right to arbitrarily conduct searches of your property.

A police officer has no right to detain you unless there exists reasonable suspicion that you committed a crime or traffic violation. However, a police officer is always allowed to initiate a voluntary conversation with you. Sometimes it is unclear whether or not a person is detained. If you are in doubt, you should ask the police officer if you are in fact free to leave.

If you are arrested, Arizona law mandates that you will be brought before a judge within twenty-four hours. This is an important hearing for you. The judge will decide what conditions, if any, must be met before you can be released from jail. You have a right to retain an attorney for this hearing to argue for your release.

Regarding the crime of driving under the influence of alcohol, the best advice is to have a designated driver. However, if you are the subject of a DUI investigation, you must be especially careful and thoughtful about what you say and do. In Arizona, a conviction for DUI guarantees a jail term.

Arizona law does not require you to submit to roadside field sobriety tests. Although these tests may assist you to convince an officer you are not intoxicated, as a general rule, refusing to take the tests is the better choice. Keep in mind, it is the police officer who subjectively decides whether you passed or failed the tests.

Deciding whether to submit to a blood, breath, or urine test is a different matter altogether. If you refuse one of these tests, you will lose your driver’s license for one year. You should consult an attorney before deciding to refuse or submit to one of these tests.

DUI is a complex and continually changing area of criminal law. However, like other criminal charges, the decisions you make during your initial contact with a police officer can be the difference between conviction and acquittal.

Become a member of the Attorneys on Retainer Program and enjoy the relief provided by an existing attorney‑client relationship, drastically reduced attorney fees, and free Strategy Sessions on applicable legal matters.

Attorney Marc J. Victor

erc W.
Hello Mr. Victor, I've been on the A.O.R program since Aug 2022, and have had to use your services five times in the past 2 and half years from my ex-wife and step son. All of five of them where dismissed !! Thanks to Rachel Moss and Tory Srewart professionalism. Actually the entire staff at Attorneys for freedom have always been very helpful and professional. I highly recommend them them for your legal needs.Thank you once again from an A.O.R. program member since 8/22.
Response from the owner:Thank you so much for the wonderful review! We are glad to hear that the AOR program was a success!
Andy A.
Lord forbid I should ever require their services.
That aside, customer service is outstanding !!
If you send them a concern or question. Don’t walk to far away, because your response is flying back at you; all of mine were answered same day including weekends.
I recommend them all day long. Cheers
Bhanu V.
Dwight B.
Every time I've called their Law firm... I've asked a question and I've gotten an answer without having to drive 45 minutes and pay someone for a 37 second answer... These people are the Best of the Best... Hope I NEVER have to use their courtroom expertise... If you get my drift 👍👍👍🇺🇲
Jon M
I recently had a double bill of my wife's membership that I caught on my credit card bill. I called and spoke to Noslen in customer service, she was able to figure out that when my wife upgraded to the new AOR service that she was double billed and took care of the error right away. That was good enough for me to be happy with her service, but she called me back right away and asked if I had been double billed the month before when I upgraded my subscription. I thought I probably hadn't but she checked and found that I had, then started a refund for me also. It is great to do business with a company that hires good people and encourages them to walk the walk as Marc Victor would say. Thank you Noslen and AOR!