Don’t Be Your Own Worst Enemy

Attorney Marc J. Victor

I cringe to think how many times clients come into my office to discuss their criminal matter with me only to learn they have done possibly irreparable damage to their case. I have found few people who are aware of their constitutional rights.

Your awareness of some simple concepts may serve you well in the event you or a loved one is the unfortunate subject of a criminal investigation. First of all, always remember, you are not required to talk to the police. There may be occasions where your persuasive oral skills will serve to get you a stern warning instead of a costly ticket; however, talking with the police will rarely benefit you when the investigation is for a crime.

In addition, talking to friends and family about your criminal matter is usually not a good idea either. Although you do not expect a friend or family member to compromise your case, you may put him or her in an unfair position. A prosecutor may summon your family member or friend to the witness stand in a criminal trial and ask questions about your statements. Such a dilemma will force your family member or friend to decide between perjury and possibly hurting your case.

Don’t get caught up by the fact that the police officer failed to inform you of your “Miranda Rights.” These are your rights to remain silent and to have an attorney present during questioning. So long as you are not under “arrest” the police officer may properly ask you questions without informing you of these rights.

You are never required to consent to a search. If a police officer has a search warrant, you must permit the search. However, if a search warrant has not yet been obtained, you should insist the officer obtain one before you voluntarily allow a search. The fact that you insist upon a search warrant does not mean you have something to hide. Rather, it is a confirmation of the constitutional concept that police do not have the right to arbitrarily conduct searches of your property.

A police officer has no right to detain you unless there exists reasonable suspicion that you committed a crime or traffic violation. However, a police officer is always allowed to initiate a voluntary conversation with you. Sometimes it is unclear whether or not a person is detained. If you are in doubt, you should ask the police officer if you are in fact free to leave.

If you are arrested, Arizona law mandates that you will be brought before a judge within twenty-four hours. This is an important hearing for you. The judge will decide what conditions, if any, must be met before you can be released from jail. You have a right to retain an attorney for this hearing to argue for your release.

Regarding the crime of driving under the influence of alcohol, the best advice is to have a designated driver. However, if you are the subject of a DUI investigation, you must be especially careful and thoughtful about what you say and do. In Arizona, a conviction for DUI guarantees a jail term.

Arizona law does not require you to submit to roadside field sobriety tests. Although these tests may assist you to convince an officer you are not intoxicated, as a general rule, refusing to take the tests is the better choice. Keep in mind, it is the police officer who subjectively decides whether you passed or failed the tests.

Deciding whether to submit to a blood, breath, or urine test is a different matter altogether. If you refuse one of these tests, you will lose your driver’s license for one year. You should consult an attorney before deciding to refuse or submit to one of these tests.

DUI is a complex and continually changing area of criminal law. However, like other criminal charges, the decisions you make during your initial contact with a police officer can be the difference between conviction and acquittal.

Become a member of the Attorneys on Retainer Program and enjoy the relief provided by an existing attorney‑client relationship, drastically reduced attorney fees, and free Strategy Sessions on applicable legal matters.

Attorney Marc J. Victor

The Attorneys For Freedom Law Firm
Excellent
4.9
Based on 447 reviews
review us on
mikey M.
mikey M.
I was very satisfied with the outcome. They did everything in their power to handle everything. Together we got the results we were wanting. I would totally recommend to anyone. It was money well spent as well. Thx again to the whole team.
Joren F.
Joren F.
Attorney Brittany helped me with my case and they were very efficient and quick to respond when I had questions. The matter was also handled for less than half the price I paid up front. I am very satisfied with their service. Thank you!
Jesse “Vetec” S.
Jesse “Vetec” S.
Just WOW, James was very very concise and accurate in the information he gave me, we spoke on the phone for over an hour and it was awesome! thank you so much for all the information you shared and i appreciate your dedication to informing others of the truth, If anyone reading this was like me on the fence about who to go with i strongly suggest you call AOR and fight out the truth, you will not be disappointed. God bless and take care!
PHX O.
PHX O.
My experience is from Elizabeth Mollenby far one is the best attorneys there is back in 2009. I was looking at 14 to 20 she got one and a half yearsamazing and it has fully changed my whole life ..You truly will be lucky if you get Elizabeth as an attorney top notch …. Tim
William K.
William K.
I think AOR is the best option and have just received my renewal. The firm refuses to answer this question: Has AOR ever represented anyone in my geographic area? No names, no details, just that question and they won’t answer it for “confidentiality” reasons. Strange I think.
Response from the owner: Thank you so much for your 5-star review, William! We have represented several people in different states on the east coast over the past 30 years. Attorney Andy Marcantel just appeared in a FL courthouse this week.  However, we have not yet had a case in NC.
js_loader