Videos/Blogs Archive list
Marc J. Victor On the Esteban Santiago Case
Nov 23, 2017
Attorney Marc J. Victor Interviewed about Fort Lauderdale Airport shooting suspect Esteban Santiago. Esteban Santiago allegedly opened fire in a baggage claim area after retrieving a handgun from his checked luggage in the airport’s second Terminal. Officials said it is still unclear why the...
The US Needs a Freedom Revival
Nov 8, 2017
The US Needs a Freedom Revival. Slowly and subconsciously, people are re-adopting the libertarian concepts that made the US great in the first place It’s so easy to celebrate our “freedoms” with song singing, national holidays, and the obligatory pledging of allegiance to the flag. Don’t get me...
Report: Guns in Home to Blame as Domestic Violence Deaths Surge in Phoenix
Jul 26, 2017
Report: Guns in Home to Blame as Domestic Violence Deaths Surge in Phoenix. Attorney Marc J. Victor Disagrees “The link between firearms and domestic violence is strong,” Schell said. “We need to look at our laws if we are going to stem this violence in Arizona.” The coalition supports universal...
4409 vs The Road Pirates
Nov 26, 2009
4409 vs The Road Pirates. Can you call a state employee a Pirate? Case dismissed - Attorney Marc J. Victor saves 4409 from the Road Pirates. A Valley man claims his First Amendment rights are being trampled on after he was arrested following a confrontation with a photo radar operator in the...
Pro Tem Recusal Minute Entry
Nov 23, 2005
A judge pro tem in Arizona recused himself from a non-violent drug case, explaining that his personal opposition to drug prohibition laws (rooted in a non-initiation of force principle and a belief in a constitutional right to control one's own body) made it impossible for him to fairly apply the law. He grounded the recusal in Arizona case law allowing voluntary recusal even without a strict legal mandate, arguments under both the Arizona and U.S. Constitutions, and his membership on NORML's legal committee, which he said reasonably called his impartiality into question under the Code of Judicial Conduct.