Reaction to FBI Raid on Trump's Mar-a-Lago Home | Attorneys for Freedom Law Firm

Reaction to FBI Raid on Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Home

Attorney Marc J. Victor

I wanted respond to the FBI raid of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Florida.

I urge everyone to use caution before making judgments about the justice department. We must wait until we have the full information on the case.

We know a warrant was served.

Warrant: a document issued by a legal or government official authorizing the police or some other body to make an arrest, search premises, or carry out some other action relating to the administration of justice:

Warrants are served all the time. Before a warrant is served, a Judge (in this case Magistrate Bruce Reinhart) reviews an affidavit. The judge needs to make a decision based on the affidavit and if there is probable cause before the warrant is issued.

Affidavit: a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, for use as evidence in court:

We need to reserve judgment until we have more information. Wait till we see the affidavit before we make any conclusions. We must get the FACTS first! Then we can look, learn, think, and analyze the facts.

In response to the smears on the credibility of Magistrate Bruce Reinhart, it is irrelevant. Reinhart was working in private practice for ten years, where he reportedly represented Epstein’s employees. This smear of his credibility is IRRELEVANT to this case.

Warrants are issued and served all the time. In some cases, a subpoena can be issued instead of a warrant.

Subpoena: is a writ issued by a government agency, most often a court, to compel testimony by a witness or production of evidence under a penalty for failure.

However, under the fourth amendment, you have a right to a neutral judge to review the affidavit to determine whether there is “probably cause” to determine a search warrant.

Fourth Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Conclusion:
Do not speculate until we have the facts! The law applies equally to everyone, it does not matter that he was a former President of the United States.

Nobody is above the law.

Stay tuned for more updates when more facts are released.

David D
I live in NJ and left US Law Shield to join AOR
Response from the owner:We are proud to represent you brother!
erc W.
Hello Mr. Victor, I've been on the A.O.R program since Aug 2022, and have had to use your services five times in the past 2 and half years from my ex-wife and step son. All of five of them where dismissed !! Thanks to Rachel Moss and Tory Srewart professionalism. Actually the entire staff at Attorneys for freedom have always been very helpful and professional. I highly recommend them them for your legal needs.Thank you once again from an A.O.R. program member since 8/22.
Response from the owner:Thank you so much for the wonderful review! We are glad to hear that the AOR program was a success!
Andy A.
Lord forbid I should ever require their services.
That aside, customer service is outstanding !!
If you send them a concern or question. Don’t walk to far away, because your response is flying back at you; all of mine were answered same day including weekends.
I recommend them all day long. Cheers
Bhanu V.
Dwight B.
Every time I've called their Law firm... I've asked a question and I've gotten an answer without having to drive 45 minutes and pay someone for a 37 second answer... These people are the Best of the Best... Hope I NEVER have to use their courtroom expertise... If you get my drift 👍👍👍🇺🇲