Most Mass Shootings Happen in Gun-Free Zones

Most Mass Shootings Happen in Gun-Free Zones

After dozens of warning signs and alerts from concerned citizens went unnoticed, a shooter walked into a South Florida high school and murdered 17 people. In the wake of the tragic mass shooting, guns and “gun-free zones” have become hot-button issues.

The Left has since turned up the volume on calls for a crackdown on Secondment Amendment rights, quickly exploiting teens who attend the targeted school to make the case for them. They have also slammed the suggestion that schools should have armed security, or perhaps well-trained, voluntarily armed teachers.

But what does the evidence say about “gun-free zones”?

According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, “gun-free zones” (areas where guns are prohibited) have been the target of more than 98% of all mass shootings. This staggering number is why such designated areas are often referred to as “soft targets,” meaning unprotected and vulnerable.

“According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, only a little more than 1% of mass public shootings since 1950 have occurred in places that were not considered to be a gun-free zone,” reports The Blaze. “In fact, as Crime Prevention Research Center President John Lott Jr. noted in October 2015, only two mass shootings in the U.S. since 1950 have occurred in an area where citizens were not prohibited from carrying a gun.”

Former Vice President Joe Biden, a Democrat, introduced the Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA) to the U.S. Senate in 1990, and it was signed into law by then-President George H.W. Bush, a Republican. The act was clearly proposed with the intent to prevent mass shootings in such precious areas as schools. But the act, as the statistic proves, did not result in the desired outcome.

While mass shootings are a complex issue with more than one action needed to prevent them, it seems unclear why gun control advocates would hold so tight to their well-intended, but ultimately dangerous “gun-free zones” even in the face of such a staggering reality. Why is it kosher to protect our politicians, Hollywood celebrities, and federal currency with guns, but not our children?

This story is not an original story from The Attorneys For Freedom Law Firm. It is a re-blog from The Daily Wire

Richard Thomas I.
Richard Thomas I.
05:05 03 Feb 23
Professional and highly knowledgeable.
Brianna M.
Brianna M.
23:21 02 Feb 23
Emma was helpful in my case and was very accessible.
Jeffrey H.
Jeffrey H.
02:07 24 Jan 23
I am a client of the Attorney's For Freedom Law Firm's "Attorney On Retainer" program (as well as... their "Self-Protection plan"). I had an unfortunate explosion involving a firearm ("accidental discharge") that was a possible felony charge in Arizona. One call to Jonathan and it was all taken care of with no further action required on my part. They truly "just a phone call away"...read more
Tomas G.
Tomas G.
18:26 27 Dec 22
I don’t know where to start from Marc welcomed me with open arms to Katie , Braeden , Rachel & the... staff with me every step helped me understand and treated me like family. I appreciate everyone at attorneys for freedom thank you & will always be family to me.read more
Bryan T.
Bryan T.
19:31 21 Dec 22
I would highly recommend this law firm. Very efficient and quick. Had no issues and they made it a... very smooth process.read more
js_loader