We Don’t Need No Stinking Zealous Advocacy

Attorney Marc J. Victor

Back in the good old days when Americans were interested in freedom, criminal defense attorneys had an ethical duty to zealously advocate for their clients. The concept being that an adversarial system of justice was more likely to produce just results than an inquisitorial system of justice. However, the Arizona Supreme Court recently decided that the age-old duty of zealous advocacy is no longer appropriate. Attorneys in Arizona now have no such ethical duty.

I interpret this change to mean the government has determined it is no longer in the government’s interest for criminal defense attorneys to be zealous when they fight the government. No kidding. One could expect nothing different so long as the government supplies all the judges, the prosecutors and strictly regulates all criminal defense attorneys. Imagine a situation where one baseball team unilaterally approves and pays the umpires and determines who plays for the other team. You wouldn’t be shocked when they picked players for the other team who agreed not to play too zealously.

I recently tried a case for a client who was charged with a crime arising out of a barroom brawl. I suspected the arresting police officer wouldn’t be able to identify my client at the trial but would nonetheless testify under oath that he could. On the day of trial, I asked my client to sit in the back row of the courtroom while his uninvolved friend accompanied me at the defense table. I informed the court my client was present in the courtroom and we were ready for trial.

As expected, the officer testified under oath that the friend sitting next to me was the man he arrested. He was absolutely certain. I immediately informed the court that I did not agree the officer had identified my client. After the government rested its case, the friend testified revealing his identity. After some expected legal wrangling, the judge entered a judgment of acquittal. My client was thrilled. The aggravated prosecutor stormed out of the courtroom.

Months later, I learned the prosecutor’s supervisor filed a bar complaint against me alleging I misled the court and an investigation was commencing. My state-granted privilege to enter into voluntary contracts with adults for representation was at stake. To his credit, the elected judge backed me and signed an affidavit stating I did nothing to mislead him. This did not deter the bar or the prosecutor who was determined to punish me for misleading the judge who says he was not misled. Indeed, the prosecutor argued to the bar that the judge’s opinion about not being misled was not relevant. After months of haggling, the state bar grudgingly admitted I had not violated any ethical duties and the complaint against me was dismissed.

Despite the fact that we all know what happened that day in court, no complaint was ever filed against the government police officer. No government investigation was commenced against the government police officer. None was expected. Government courts have ruled that government police officers are permitted to lie to citizens all they want. They often do. However, government prosecutors often charge citizens with crimes if a citizen lies to a government police officer.

So long as the government administers the criminal justice system, only the government will be protected. Whenever you find yourself in a government court fighting the government, remember that the government doesn’t want your attorney to have an ethical obligation to zealously represent you. They want your quick plea of guilty and the accompanying fines and various sanctions which now include your DNA in many cases. Although it may seem unfair, I’m sure the government set up this system with only our protection in mind.

Attorney Marc J. Victor

Lindsay H
Lindsay H
1708629075
My experience with Attorneys For Freedom was exceptional. Andy Marcantel was understanding to my... circumstances and always brought a thoughtful and results-oriented approach. He was amazingly knowledgeable, transparent and respectful. He will tell you exactly what to expect in your situation. It was a relief knowing Andy and his team were in my corner fighting for me every step of the way and getting me the best possible outcome. I am forever grateful to everyone at Attorneys For Freedom.read more
Christopher J.
Christopher J.
1707856832
Had a self defense situation on a late Friday night. Called the emergency hotline and got in touch... with someone right away. Didn't matter how late it was. Once they understood the situation they gave me fantastic advice and steps and where fully prepared to spring into legal action on my behalf if they needed to. Throughly impressed. I'm heading to Chicago for the next month and I feel a lot better doing so with Attorneys For Freedom on my side. Chicago very much is a third world now and if I have to defend myself I can worry about keeping myself alive and safe rather than the legal part of it. I know that for sure.read more
Ricardo F.
Ricardo F.
1706852240
Switched over from USCCA as soon as you went national 👍🏼 Semper Fi
Michael B.
Michael B.
1706667435
My story, I was facing multiple felony charges and a prosecutor who would only settle for time in... prison! I contacted Andy and his team at Attorneys for Freedom and they got to work on my case. I was able to walk away from the courtroom with probation! Fantastic work from these guys! Don't settle for amateurs. Call the BEST!read more
Nathan E.
Nathan E.
1706143239
I was extremely please with Rachel and Vicky! They were easy to talk to, professional and helped me... get all my ducks in a row to get my case dismissed. Very happy with their service!read more
js_loader