We Don't Need No Stinking Zealous Advocacy | Attorneys for Freedom Law Firm

We Don’t Need No Stinking Zealous Advocacy

Attorney Marc J. Victor

Back in the good old days when Americans were interested in freedom, criminal defense attorneys had an ethical duty to zealously advocate for their clients. The concept being that an adversarial system of justice was more likely to produce just results than an inquisitorial system of justice. However, the Arizona Supreme Court recently decided that the age-old duty of zealous advocacy is no longer appropriate. Attorneys in Arizona now have no such ethical duty.

I interpret this change to mean the government has determined it is no longer in the government’s interest for criminal defense attorneys to be zealous when they fight the government. No kidding. One could expect nothing different so long as the government supplies all the judges, the prosecutors and strictly regulates all criminal defense attorneys. Imagine a situation where one baseball team unilaterally approves and pays the umpires and determines who plays for the other team. You wouldn’t be shocked when they picked players for the other team who agreed not to play too zealously.

I recently tried a case for a client who was charged with a crime arising out of a barroom brawl. I suspected the arresting police officer wouldn’t be able to identify my client at the trial but would nonetheless testify under oath that he could. On the day of trial, I asked my client to sit in the back row of the courtroom while his uninvolved friend accompanied me at the defense table. I informed the court my client was present in the courtroom and we were ready for trial.

As expected, the officer testified under oath that the friend sitting next to me was the man he arrested. He was absolutely certain. I immediately informed the court that I did not agree the officer had identified my client. After the government rested its case, the friend testified revealing his identity. After some expected legal wrangling, the judge entered a judgment of acquittal. My client was thrilled. The aggravated prosecutor stormed out of the courtroom.

Months later, I learned the prosecutor’s supervisor filed a bar complaint against me alleging I misled the court and an investigation was commencing. My state-granted privilege to enter into voluntary contracts with adults for representation was at stake. To his credit, the elected judge backed me and signed an affidavit stating I did nothing to mislead him. This did not deter the bar or the prosecutor who was determined to punish me for misleading the judge who says he was not misled. Indeed, the prosecutor argued to the bar that the judge’s opinion about not being misled was not relevant. After months of haggling, the state bar grudgingly admitted I had not violated any ethical duties and the complaint against me was dismissed.

Despite the fact that we all know what happened that day in court, no complaint was ever filed against the government police officer. No government investigation was commenced against the government police officer. None was expected. Government courts have ruled that government police officers are permitted to lie to citizens all they want. They often do. However, government prosecutors often charge citizens with crimes if a citizen lies to a government police officer.

So long as the government administers the criminal justice system, only the government will be protected. Whenever you find yourself in a government court fighting the government, remember that the government doesn’t want your attorney to have an ethical obligation to zealously represent you. They want your quick plea of guilty and the accompanying fines and various sanctions which now include your DNA in many cases. Although it may seem unfair, I’m sure the government set up this system with only our protection in mind.

Attorney Marc J. Victor

Mont B.
Mont B.
20:45 28 Jun 22
I really appreciate the teamwork culture of the firm. I worked with Caroline in the Honolulu... office. Caroline was extremely professional and went above and beyond working on short notice and working on the weekend. She worked really hard to obtain the best outcome for me. Thank you!read more
Diana V.
Diana V.
00:43 12 Jun 22
I am grateful beyond belief for the incredible team that helped me. Jody Broaddus, thank you for... everything you and your team did for me. I appreciate you from the bottom of my heart.I haven’t been able to Breath right and my life has been rough. I’m still trying to recover and I know it will take a while but because of God putting the right lawyer and team in front of it all, I now have a light at the end of the tunnel. I thank you for the kind words and dedication you put forward.Thank you and God bless youread more
Hardeep K.
Hardeep K.
16:50 27 May 22
Jason D.
Jason D.
20:29 29 Apr 22
Attorneys for freedom was a 10/10 on handling my case, i had the pleasure of speaking directly to... the attorney and staff. Everybody was professional and helped me every step of the way giving these issues that create havoc and frustration in your personal life.Rachel Moss, was exceptional in going above and beyond what was necessary to get the results we were going for and we accomplished what we sout out for. Her communication and understanding of the law and policies led us to a great victory that we fought for from the beginning.Thank you to the entire staff for everythingI do appreciate your hard work, i definately could not have got the results we achieved on my own.read more
Spiritual T.
Spiritual T.
19:01 13 Apr 22
I had a hiccup with this company and I have to say I’ve never seen a faster turn around on fixing... the issue. John Harris went above and beyond my expectations on getting this resolved and I am thankful for his fast and prompt acts and the awesome service. Thank you John.read more
js_loader