We Don’t Need No Stinking Zealous Advocacy

Attorney Marc J. Victor

Back in the good old days when Americans were interested in freedom, criminal defense attorneys had an ethical duty to zealously advocate for their clients. The concept being that an adversarial system of justice was more likely to produce just results than an inquisitorial system of justice. However, the Arizona Supreme Court recently decided that the age-old duty of zealous advocacy is no longer appropriate. Attorneys in Arizona now have no such ethical duty.

I interpret this change to mean the government has determined it is no longer in the government’s interest for criminal defense attorneys to be zealous when they fight the government. No kidding. One could expect nothing different so long as the government supplies all the judges, the prosecutors and strictly regulates all criminal defense attorneys. Imagine a situation where one baseball team unilaterally approves and pays the umpires and determines who plays for the other team. You wouldn’t be shocked when they picked players for the other team who agreed not to play too zealously.

I recently tried a case for a client who was charged with a crime arising out of a barroom brawl. I suspected the arresting police officer wouldn’t be able to identify my client at the trial but would nonetheless testify under oath that he could. On the day of trial, I asked my client to sit in the back row of the courtroom while his uninvolved friend accompanied me at the defense table. I informed the court my client was present in the courtroom and we were ready for trial.

As expected, the officer testified under oath that the friend sitting next to me was the man he arrested. He was absolutely certain. I immediately informed the court that I did not agree the officer had identified my client. After the government rested its case, the friend testified revealing his identity. After some expected legal wrangling, the judge entered a judgment of acquittal. My client was thrilled. The aggravated prosecutor stormed out of the courtroom.

Months later, I learned the prosecutor’s supervisor filed a bar complaint against me alleging I misled the court and an investigation was commencing. My state-granted privilege to enter into voluntary contracts with adults for representation was at stake. To his credit, the elected judge backed me and signed an affidavit stating I did nothing to mislead him. This did not deter the bar or the prosecutor who was determined to punish me for misleading the judge who says he was not misled. Indeed, the prosecutor argued to the bar that the judge’s opinion about not being misled was not relevant. After months of haggling, the state bar grudgingly admitted I had not violated any ethical duties and the complaint against me was dismissed.

Despite the fact that we all know what happened that day in court, no complaint was ever filed against the government police officer. No government investigation was commenced against the government police officer. None was expected. Government courts have ruled that government police officers are permitted to lie to citizens all they want. They often do. However, government prosecutors often charge citizens with crimes if a citizen lies to a government police officer.

So long as the government administers the criminal justice system, only the government will be protected. Whenever you find yourself in a government court fighting the government, remember that the government doesn’t want your attorney to have an ethical obligation to zealously represent you. They want your quick plea of guilty and the accompanying fines and various sanctions which now include your DNA in many cases. Although it may seem unfair, I’m sure the government set up this system with only our protection in mind.

Attorney Marc J. Victor

Alex W.
I had a helpful interaction with Ms.Loya - 10/10 customer service.

I've investigated testimonials, consumed the YouTube, and watched the video combing through agreement.
It's a little corny, but this law firm is like that blindfolded lady holding a balance - these guys are true patriots.

I'm a Baptist so I go into all kinds of bad neighborhoods and apartments, I interact with all kinds of people. I've seen the pit bulls, I've seen the thugs, and I've been pulled into arguments and yelled at.
If I ever pepper-spray a dog and it doesn't go over well, I'm calling these guys. Lol
And if God forbid I have to defend my life or someone else's, AOR is the chariot I'm taking to war.
This is aggressive defense, this is what they do everyday for decades - they have freedom and justice for all on the agenda.
Aidan B.
Tory and Rachel kept me in loop the entire case and the end result was a diversion of my charges. They did a great job and I really will appreciate the two of them for a long time.
Response from the owner:Thank you for your kind words! We are very lucky to have Tory and Rachel at our law firm!
Braxton D.
S K
Highly recommended firm!!! I can’t say enough positive things about this team!! From pre-trial to post conviction their team strives to represent their clients in the most aggressive way!! Do not think twice about using Marc’s team as they absolutely will give you the BEST defense representation!! I have personally used them and “another top law firm” and wish I had found them before wasting my time and money on the “other” firm!! This company is the REAL DEAL!!! I have and will continue to recommend them with 10 stars!!! You are in the BEST hands here! - past client and very happy!
Response from the owner:Thank you so much for your review! We appreciate your support!
joey M.
"Incredible response time! I sent an email and received a call almost immediately. The representative was professional, patient, and extremely helpful. Truly outstanding service!"
Response from the owner:Thanks Joey! Your feedback means a lot to us, and we are grateful for the opportunity to provide you with the support you needed. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you need anything in the future!