My Journey To Libertarianville

Attorney Marc J. Victor

I’ve always been a loudmouth. Even as a young boy, my mother would often say, “Someday, that mouth of yours is going to get you in trouble.” Today, as a criminal defense attorney, I use that “mouth of mine” to help get people OUT of trouble. It wasn’t always that way.

Like most other loud mouths, I was always interested in politics. However, like almost all other Boston area Jews, I was surrounded by long-time liberal Democrats. Although there may have been a time in my youth when I was in the presence of a Republican, such unpleasantness was always kept from me. I had always been informed that Democrats were “for the people” and Republicans were “for big business.” If there was more to the analysis, I never heard it.

Being most comfortable in the midst of any controversy, I think my youthful pronouncement that I had decided to be a Republican was more of a reaction against the Democrat Party monopoly than a statement of principle. To their credit, my parents informed me that my Republican leanings were OK so long as I did not publicize them in front of the elder generation. I think they believed it was just some crazy phase I was going through. Ultimately, they were correct.

At some point, I became a Republican because I agreed with what Republicans were saying. In addition to sounding whiny and wimpy, the Democrats always struck me as needing a babysitter to help with living their lives. The Republicans were talking about individual responsibility and low taxes. I really bought into the limited government concept. I started arguing with Democrats about everything; whether they wanted to argue or not.

I began my college career as a political science major at the University of Massachusetts in Boston. The school is not known for its great libertarian bent. I don’t know if being a socialist was a requirement to become a professor, but it sure seemed like it to me. I recall the permanent Marxist information table being a popular spot among many of the students. Everyone in my political science classes knew me. Some knew me as the loudmouth Republican idiot. Others just knew me as the loudmouth. I loved it.

Somewhere in the midst of my battles with liberals, I began to notice there were some pesky issues where the liberal Democrat voices made some sense. I couldn’t deny their good points on various individual rights issues such as free speech, sodomy laws, homosexuality, pornography, and separation of church and state.

Being tired of shoveling snow and a fan of the summertime, I transferred to Arizona State University as a justice studies major. In addition to having a few conservatives around, there was no Marxist table to be found at Arizona State University. Although my Republican views had started to moderate on some individual rights issues, I was still fool enough to extol the virtues of the war on drugs.

One day after class, I participated in a heated argument about the drug war. During my long walk to the poor man’s parking lot, the economic-based argument against the drug war started to sink into my hard head. I could feel myself having to change my deeply held view about the drug war and adopt a pro-legalization position. Later, I realized those great Republican pronouncements about individual responsibility were not compatible with a war on drugs.

When I entered law school at Southwestern University in Los Angeles, I was a confused conservative; not comfortable with either the Republicans or the Democrats. In one sense I was better off because I could argue with both the Republicans and Democrats. Merely rejecting both parties didn’t stop me from being a loudmouth. Although I had positions on various issues, I lacked a coherent philosophical base.

One day, I met Professor Butler Shaffer. He told us to refer to him either as “Butler” or “God” if we weren’t comfortable using his first name. I figured out quickly this guy wasn’t a typical law professor. He showed up to class one day wearing a tee-shirt with the word “anarchy” on it. I was intrigued.

Butler posed questions about self-ownership and the legitimacy of the constitution. He insisted that all political questions were really different versions of the same question, “Who makes the decision over property; the owner or someone else?” He boiled all questions down to a property analysis. I harassed the guy.

After endless hours kicking around the questions Butler posed, I started to understand. Butler gave me a book by Murray Rothbard that discussed the monetary system. I also read Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt and Libertarianism in One Lesson by David Bergland while I was pouring through the required law school reading. Butler invited me to two discussion groups entitled the Mencken Forum and the Nock Forum respectively. I attended both faithfully and became a libertarian junkie. I couldn’t get enough of the freedom philosophy.

After flirting with the Libertarian Party, I came to the realization that such a party is a contradiction in terms. Although I sympathize with political Libertarians, I do not count myself among them. On the other hand, I do not believe there is or can exist a centralized plan for freedom. I have come to believe there are two groups of people; those who coerce others and those who do not.

After almost ten years as a practicing criminal defense attorney, I can say few libertarians have fought the state more regularly. I am a libertarian on the front lines in the war against tyranny; an epic multigenerational and honorable struggle. My law firm www.victorandhall.com is strongly pro-freedom. I have hosted regular discussion groups, given speeches, hosted a radio show, and sponsored debates. In 2000, I co-founded the Freedom Summit www.freedomsummit.com with my partner and libertarian guerilla warrior Ernest Hancock.

Although neither the Mencken Forum nor the Nock Forum continue, the Freedom Summit exists to hopefully rescue lost libertarian souls from the intellectual chaos that prevails today. In the end, my mom was right. It is my loud mouth that will most likely get me into trouble. On the other hand, I wouldn’t have it any other way.

Attorney Marc J. Victor

Eye On P.
Eye On P.
1720977655
I signed up for an account on a Sunday and made an error. I was completely surprised when Shanice... contacted me via email to help fix the error. That was incredible as I was going to wait until Monday to call and get help. Very proactive and professional. If this is an indication as to the type of service they provide, I made the right choice.read more
Dana M.
Dana M.
1720909366
I spoke with Miss Shanice on a Saturday. She returned my call within a couple of hours. She was... very pleasant and professional. We converted my plan to the Family Plan. It took less than five minutes. I'm very pleased with AOR. I hope that I'll never need them.read more
J R
J R
1720655144
The Attorney and Paralegal I worked with did an extraordinary job in aiding my comprehension of the... legal system as it pertained to my situation. Attorney Emma Wittmann and Paralegal Tory Stewart were both extreme knowledgeable, efficient at answering any/all questions, and went above and beyond in all aspects. I am quite pleased with their work. I absolutely and unequivocally recommend both Attorney Emma Wittmann and Paralegal Tory Stewart should you be in need of legal counsel, and by extension law firm Attorneys for Freedom. Thank you all so much!read more
Timothy M.
Timothy M.
1720647678
I researched Attorneys On Retainer extensively and found nothing but excellent reviews. I want to... add my review of five stars to the reviews after interacting with the firm and specifically Mike Wasdin. He was a great help in navigating the paperwork and my membership within the organization. Thank You Mike.read more
gilbert C.
gilbert C.
1720060140
This message is for all the gun owners in the state of Connecticut recently we have some new laws... which are very ridiculous but anyway this is regarding the Attorneys For Freedom the return every cent that I spend for the past year because they couldn’t work in the state of Connecticut, but they have the integrity and the ethics to still represent us in case of self-defense cases without charging usthey’re working to see if they can change the law and be able to work one more time in the state of Connecticut I would like to encourage every gun owner in the state of Connecticut and outside the state of Connecticut that happen to have the same situation that we and write a review a positive review because they deserve itI have to admit I was very surprised, but it was a good surprise. It is rare to find this caliber of people.They are willing to do the right thing so please support Attorneys For Freedom because they are unique among the rest.read more
js_loader