Questions Mount Over Maricopa County Attorney Allister Adel & Death Penalty Cases | Attorneys for Freedom Law Firm

Questions Mount Over Maricopa County Attorney Allister Adel & Death Penalty Cases

Attorney Marc J. Victor

Adel was appointed to serve as Maricopa County Attorney in 2019. Her appointment as Maricopa County Attorney came after her predecessor, Bill Montgomery, was appointed to the Arizona Supreme Court.

At the time of her appointment, officials say Adel is the first woman to serve in that position, though another woman held the post on an interim basis after Montgomery’s resignation. Prior to her time as County Attorney, Adel worked as a prosecutor, administrative law judge, and general counsel for the Arizona Department of Child Safety. She was elected to the position in her own right in 2020, defeating Julie Gunnigle in the General Election that year.

Under Arizona law, only the elected county attorney can approve notices of intent to seek the death penalty. Since she took office in 2019, Adel has signed off on 17 notices of intent to seek the death penalty, compared to 41 notices for Adel’s predecessor from 2010 to 2012, and 89 for Montgomery’s predecessor, Andrew Thomas, from 2005 to 2007.

“The county attorney is the most powerful person in the justice system, hands down. More powerful than the judge, more powerful than the defense lawyer. Prosecutors have an unbelievable amount of discretion,” said Marc J. Victor, a criminal defense attorney and managing partner of Attorneys For Freedom.

Victor says he expects other defense attorneys with clients facing the death penalty to put the pressure on MCAO amid Adel’s mounting controversy.

“I would expect nothing less of competent criminal defense lawyers in this state,” said Victor. “They’re not gonna sit by idly and let their clients be treated without scrupulous attention to due process.”

Victor also talked about other possible ripple effects.

“I guess the initial threshold question is: was she competent and fit for duty at the time she made these kinds of decisions? said Victor.

“Of course, defendants should be concerned. Of course, victims should be concerned. Family members of victims should be concerned, but all citizens should be concerned,” said Victor.

Pirate M.
Pirate M.
1715105983
Hello To all,I want to say that Attorneys for Freedom are an outstanding law firm for restoration... of Rights! I'd like to point out my Gratitude and stellar service that I received from Brittany my assigned attorney and Bonny her paralegal. What I thought was going to take 3-4 months or more for restoration of my Rights happened in less than the 3 months they estimated. Talk about under promising and over delivering, here they are. I am so pleased with the way these 2 Awesome ladies helped me and handled my restoration of rights. Even when the Courts "misplaced or accidentally neglected" one of my cases, They were on top of it and completed the task for signatory approval asap, in my opinion, above the standard. I recommend this Law Firm to anyone and everyone that may need help for Rights Restoration.I will be moving forward with Attorneys on Retainer as well so that I know I have the bigger Gorilla in my corner when it comes to legal matters with a self defense situation! I am glad there is a reputable and stellar law firm that loves the Constitution and supports our 2nd Amendment Right! I couldn't be happier.read more
Megasportsman79
Megasportsman79
1714953297
These guys are the real deal !!! I found out about them from you tube’s Heavy duty country channel.... He exposed all the “self defense ins schemes”. Mark Victor and his team are unbelievable! My wife and I as well as my fam will always be members ! Keep up the great work!!!!read more
Joel C.
Joel C.
1714778522
I have a strong legal background anend as such I really vetted AOR as a solution for my need for a... firm with dedicated and sound legal representation. I thoroughly scrutinized the agreements, the founding attorneys, the reviueews, and to the extent attorney client privilege would allow, their reputation in the legal community.AORs Self-Protection Retainer Agreement is justly unilateral and legally fair in its Ts and Cs.It is broad and comprehensive for the kind of protection we in the gun advocacy community need as opposed the other kinds of so called triditional self defense defense "insurance" who offer to pay defense expenses but who's "policy" Ts an Cs have more exclusion language than coverage statements. However, the real advantage lies with their customer service. I made a dozen calls to clarify questions I had before I signed up and each time an incredibley knowledgeable CS rep named Tristen responded immediately. Every question was answered expertly and as a member I am entitled to speak directly to any attorney personally. I made the same inquiries in comparison with the insurance carriers and was put on hold, transferred asked to email in a question or was never called back. In a crises, who do you want to talk to in your moment of need,Tristen, or an attorney OR a voicemail, a requested email or a call center for a promise of call back?read more
Dominic P.
Dominic P.
1714778171
left FLP (Firearms Legal Protection) and i can actually say i dont regret it at all, its was well... worth it after doing my research and also watching AOR videos, AOR thank youread more
CC C.
CC C.
1714413376
ATENTION to ALL FIREARM OWNERS:("ATTORNEY'S for FREEDOM & ATTORNEY'S on RETAINER") are without... question the "ONLY" CHOICE for your Legal Defense in a court of Law!! I have done my homework on other companies who say they will defend you if you hold a policy of there insurance!! ......"ATTORNEY'S ON RETAINER": are the (ONLY ONES WHO ARE REAL ATTORNEY'S) These other shills are insurance companies, period!!! Don't take my word for it.... do your own research of ("USCCA")...("US LAW SHIELD")...("FIREARMS LEGAL PROTECTION")...("Second Call Defense")...("ARMED CITIZENS LEGAL DEFENSE")...("CCW SAFE")...("Right To Bear")!!! Check out there POLICY descriptions!! EXAMPLE: USCCA POLICY SAYS in the fine print.... if they defend you in court and you are found guilty...("YOU THE POLICY HOLDER") must pay back to the insurance company "all FEES and costs" to the insurance company ("USCCA)"!!! Would you trust this policy to protect you from a potential prison sentence??? I think not!!! Do you homework as I HAVE!! ("ATTORNEY'S ON RETAINER") should be your ONLY CHOICE to protect you in Court!! I just secured my POLICY!!! Get smart and protect yourself and your family!!!! This is not a paid nor shill advertisement!!! By a PATRIOT who cares about your right to defend yourself and those you Love!!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸💖☝️😀read more
js_loader